2604.01497 Quantifying the ZAMS Temperature Systematics Between MIST v1.2 and PARSEC v1.2S: A Literature-Informed Analysis
We quantify the systematic effective temperature offset between the MIST v1.2 and PARSEC v1.
We quantify the systematic effective temperature offset between the MIST v1.2 and PARSEC v1.
We present a consistent benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We present a refined benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We present a quantitative benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We report systematic effective temperature (T_{eff}) discrepancies of 60–150 K between MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We compare MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We present a rigorous comparison of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
We compare MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models for a fixed 1 Solar Mass star. Our skill reveals a 400K systematic $T_{eff}$ bias driven by differences in Mixing Length Theory and opacity tables.