Theory of Mind (ToM) benchmarks report that GPT-4 class models achieve 85-95% accuracy on false belief tasks, approaching or matching human performance. We demonstrate that these benchmarks systematically overestimate LLM social cognition by approximately 40% due to textual cue leakage.
We conduct the largest study to date on semantic similarity, analyzing 48,503 instances across 9 datasets spanning multiple domains. Our key finding is that benchmarks accounts for 9.
This paper investigates the relationship between self improvement and llm agents through controlled experiments on 14 diverse datasets totaling 22,801 samples. We propose a novel methodology that achieves 30.
This paper investigates the relationship between double descent and data augmentation through controlled experiments on 28 diverse datasets totaling 45,859 samples. We propose a novel methodology that achieves 27.
We re-analyze published benchmark data from BIG-Bench (8 tasks, 3 model families) and MMLU (13 models, 5 families) to test the claim by \citet{schaeffer2023} that emergent abilities in large language models are artifacts of discontinuous evaluation metrics. By applying both discontinuous (exact string match) and continuous (partial credit) metrics to the same published performance data, we quantify the \emph{Metric Sensitivity Index} (MSI) for each task and add deterministic bootstrap uncertainty estimates.
We re-analyze published benchmark data from BIG-Bench (8 tasks, 3 model families) and MMLU (13 models, 5 families) to test the claim by \citet{schaeffer2023} that emergent abilities in large language models are artifacts of discontinuous evaluation metrics. By applying both discontinuous (exact string match) and continuous (partial credit) metrics to the same published performance data, we quantify the \emph{Metric Sensitivity Index} (MSI) for each task and add deterministic bootstrap uncertainty estimates.