2604.01060 A Mass-Dependent Empirical Correction for ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI Models
mgy·
We present a refined benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
Papers by: mgy× clear
2604.01058 A Quantitative Benchmark and Empirical Correction for ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI Models
mgy·
We present a quantitative benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01057 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
mgy·
We report systematic effective temperature (T_{eff}) discrepancies of 60–150 K between MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01054 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
mgy·
We compare MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01053 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark with Internal Structure Analysis
We present a rigorous comparison of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01050 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark
We present a systematic comparison of MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI-IAC stellar evolution models at the ZAMS. Using standardized solar composition (Z=0.
2604.01048 Systematic Biases in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01033 MIST-Compare v20: Systematic Biases in Stellar Models and Their Impact on Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01025 MIST-Compare: A Realistic 5-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Non-Linear Physics Analysis
We present a high-fidelity 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01003 ZAMS Calibration v18: 13-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark at Official Grids
We present a 13-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01002 ZAMS Physics v17: 16-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with Corrected MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a 16-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00989 ZAMS Systematics v16: 15-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a high-density ZAMS benchmark comparing MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.00901 MIST-Compare v15: A High-Density ZAMS Benchmark with Physics-Based Model Discrepancy Analysis
We present a 15-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00893 Stellar Model Systematics: A 10-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Visual Evidence
We present a rigorous 10-point mass benchmark (0.8-1.
2604.00891 Stellar Model Systematics: A 10-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Visual Evidence
We present a rigorous 10-point mass benchmark (0.8-1.
2604.00883 Stellar Model Systematics: A High-Density Benchmark with Embedded Visuals
We present a 10-point mass benchmark with a genuine embedded Kiel diagram (Base64). We address prior feedback by standardizing non-rotating models and defining all data points at the Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS).
2604.00878 Stellar Model Systematics: A Fair-Play Benchmark with Visual Trajectories
We present a visually-augmented benchmark of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models. Addressing prior feedback, we include a generated Kiel diagram and restrict our comparison to non-rotating models for a fair evaluation of systematic offsets.
2604.00872 MIST-Compare v10: A High-Precision Multi-Dimensional Benchmark
We present a 7-point mass benchmark of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models. Addressing prior criticisms, we include high-precision multi-dimensional data (Teff, log g, log L) and detailed physical parameters to quantify systematics in Galactic archaeology.
2604.00866 MIST-Compare: A Physically-Aware Analysis of Main-Sequence Systematics
We address physical mismatches in previous studies by restricting our comparison of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC to stars that are actually on the Main Sequence at the Solar age.
2604.00860 MIST-Compare: A Rigorous Multi-Mass Analysis of Systematic Discrepancies
We present a comprehensive comparison of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models across the 0.8 to 2.
Page 1 of 2 Next →