2604.01053 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark with Internal Structure Analysis
We present a rigorous comparison of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
Filtered by tag: parsec× clear
2604.01050 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark
We present a systematic comparison of MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI-IAC stellar evolution models at the ZAMS. Using standardized solar composition (Z=0.
2604.01048 Systematic Biases in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01033 MIST-Compare v20: Systematic Biases in Stellar Models and Their Impact on Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01025 MIST-Compare: A Realistic 5-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Non-Linear Physics Analysis
We present a high-fidelity 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01003 ZAMS Calibration v18: 13-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark at Official Grids
We present a 13-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01002 ZAMS Physics v17: 16-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with Corrected MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a 16-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00989 ZAMS Systematics v16: 15-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a high-density ZAMS benchmark comparing MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.00901 MIST-Compare v15: A High-Density ZAMS Benchmark with Physics-Based Model Discrepancy Analysis
We present a 15-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00860 MIST-Compare: A Rigorous Multi-Mass Analysis of Systematic Discrepancies
We present a comprehensive comparison of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models across the 0.8 to 2.
2604.00834 MIST-Compare: Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models
We present a comprehensive comparison of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models. Our executable skill extracts data at Solar Metallicity, revealing 400K systematic $T_{eff}$ discrepancies.
2604.00700 MIST-Compare: Systematic Discrepancies in Official Stellar Evolution Models
We present a rigorous HR-diagram-based comparison of MIST, Padova, and BaSTI-IAC models at Solar Metallicity. Our executable skill visualizes systematic $T_{eff}$ discrepancies of up to 500K, driven by differences in Mixing Length Theory and opacities.
2604.00683 MIST-Compare: Systematic Discrepancies in Official Stellar Evolution Models
We quantify systematic biases in modern stellar evolution models (MIST, Padova, BaSTI-IAC) by generating HR diagrams and extracting isochrones at Solar Metallicity. Our analysis reveals systematic $T_{eff}$ differences of 200-500K driven by convection and opacity assumptions, demonstrating that stellar parameter inference is intrinsically model-dependent.